« Main page

The state control will check pre-trial prison

Valery Levaneuski has asked the state control to find out where “vanishes” the ware contentment intended for persons, taken into custody.

Valery Levaneuski within the limits of the program «on the termination of infringements of the law in pre-trial prisons, in prisons and in correctional facilities» has asked the state control to check up - where money leaves the budget the states intended for maintenance by a ware contentment of persons, taken into custody. On the one hand, there are certain norms of maintenance with a ware contentment of the persons taken into custody, money is allocated for it from the budget, on the other hand, and from this ware contentment the persons taken into custody do not receive anything. That there are norms of ware contentment, the persons taken into custody guess, but this information is not given to them on not clear to the normal person to the reasons. Probably, the signature stamp has “confidentially been imposed by persons who, using the office position and unjustified closeness of system of execution of punishments, probably, have benefit from such» business”. Strange, but for two years spent in different “zones” and pre-trial prisons, Valery Levaneuski and has not met the person who though has received something from the ware contentment put to him in pre-trial prison. Absence of the appropriate control over activity of pre-trial prisons only aggravates a problem. We result endurances from Valery Levaneuski’s statement in Committee of State Control.

COMMITTEE OF THE STATE CONTROL OF BELARUS

Levaneuski Valery Stanislavovich

THE STATEMENT
About maintenance of the persons taken into custody, the put ware contentment

According to the norms of a ware contentment confirmed by the decision of the Ministry of Internal Affairs â„–163 from 30.06.2003 to persons taken into custody (accused, the preventive punishment which is selected - imprisonment) to the citizen placed in pre-trial prison, the insulator’s administration is obliged to give out following new things:

To men - a cap with ear-flaps from artificial fur, a headdress summer, a padded jacket wadded, a suit cotton, a shirt top cotton, a shirt and underpants, a vest, cowards, boots leather on a rubber sole, slippers, puttee cotton summer (2 steams), socks cotton (2 steams), felt boots, mittens wadded

To women: a scarf half-woolen, a kerchief cotton, a padded jacket wadded, a dress cotton (2 pieces), a shirt (2 pieces), drawers cotton (2 pieces), a bra (2 pieces), stockings cotton (2 pieces), boots leather on a rubber sole, slippers, puttee cotton summer (2 steams), socks cotton (2 steams), felt boots, mittens wadded.
(With the decision text it is possible will familiarize to the address in the Internet: )

And, all these things should be the established sample and certain quality.
But, in infringement of the given decision to the persons taken into custody, anything does not stand out at all, than the rights of the given category of citizens essentially are broken.
This information on the put ware contentment disappearing administration of pre-trial prison, as well as other legal information. Those from the persons taken into custody, who tries to receive the given legal information or to achieve delivery of ware contentment, are exposed to prosecutions from administration, up to tortures and mockeries as was with me when I contained in pre-trial prison-1 of Grodno from May till October, 2004. The same situation, according to others condemned and accused is in others pre-trial prisons of Belarus.

To me it is not clear, why the put ware contentment does not stand out. Or it is plundered by officials of Penalty Executions Department of Ministry of Internal Affairs RB, or not delivered in pre-trial prison.
The system of the account of the given out property to the persons taken into custody, is imperfect, allows to do additions and notes. I do not exclude possibility and falsifications of documents by officials of pre-trial prisons of delivery of ware contentment to the persons taken into custody for the purpose of plunder. Under documents, probably, the persons taken into custody also receive ware contentment since expenses of this part are financed from the state budget, but the most ware contentment do not see.

In connection with the above-stated, I ask:
1. To spend complex check on the facts stated in the given statement.
2. To oblige a management of Penalty Executions Department of Ministry of Internal Affairs RB to give out the put ware contentment to the persons taken into custody, according to the accepted norms, the corresponding sample and quality not later than three days of a premise accused in pre-trial prison.
3. To develop and accept system of the account and the control of delivery of ware contentment in pre-trial prisons, excluding possibility not deliveries of a ware contentment to the persons taken into custody, possibility of falsification of the documents connected with delivery of a ware contentment.

04.06.06 Valery Levaneuski

The Press-service